Monday, December 28, 2009

Presenting a canon of names of contemporary India

Indian Political Thought: A Reader

Edited by Aakash Singh, Silika Mohapatra

Price: $41.95
  • ISBN: 978-0-415-56294-2 Binding: Paperback (also available in Hardback)
  • Published by: Routledge Publication Date: 26th April 2010 (Available for Pre-order)
  • Pages: 320 About the Book
This Reader provides a comprehensive introduction to the study of contemporary Indian political theory. Tracing the development of the discipline and offering a clear presentation of the most influential literature in the field, it brings together contributions by outstanding and well-known academics on contemporary Indian political thought. The Reader weaves together relevant works from the social sciences — sociology, anthropology, law, history, philosophy, feminist and postcolonial theory — which shape the nature of political thought in India today. Themes both unique to the Indian political milieu as well as of universal significance are reflected upon, including tradition, secularism, communalism, modernity, feminism, justice and human rights. Presenting a canon of names and offering a framework for further research within the broad thematic categories, this is a timely and invaluable reference tool, indispensable to both students and scholars.

Table of Contents

Foreword. Introduction: What is Indian Political Thought? Aakash Singh and Silika Mohapatra Part 1: Provocation 1. The Poverty of Indian Political Theory Bhikhu Parekh Part 2: Evocation 2. Gandhi's Ambedkar Ramachandra Guha 3. The Quest for Justice: Evoking Ghandi Neera Chandhoke 4. Tagore and His India Amartya Sen Part 3: Secularization 5. Is Secularism Alien to Indian Civilization? Romila Thapar 6. Secularism Revisited: Doctrine of Destiny or Political Ideology? T.N. Madan 7. The Distinctiveness of Indian Secularism Rajeev Bhargava Part 4: Communalization 8. The Blindness of Insight: Why Communalism in India is about Caste Dilip M. Menon 9. In Search of Integration and Identity: Indian Muslims since Independence Mushiral Hasan 10. Sikh Fundamentalism: Translating History into Theory Harjot Oberoi Part 5: Modernization 11. Gandhi, Newton and the Enlightenment Akeel Bilgrami 12. Scientific Temper: Arguments for an Indian Enlightenment Meera Nanda 13. Outline of a Revisionist Theory of Modernity Sudipta Kaviraj Part 6: Reconstruction 14. Reconstructing Childhood: A Critique of the Ideology of Adulthood Ashis Nandy 15. Subaltern Studies as Postcolonial Criticism Gyan Prakash 16. The Commitment to Theory Homi Bhabha Part 7: Emancipation 17. Justice of Human Rights in Indian Constitutionalism Upendra Baxi 18. Emancipatory Feminist Theory in Postcolonial India Ratna Kapur 19. Righting Wrongs Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak Part 8: Conclusion 20. The Poverty of Western Political Theory: Concluding Remarks on Concepts like ‘Community’ East and West Partha Chatterjee

About the Author(s)

Aakash Singh is Research Professor at the Center for Ethics and Global Politics, Luiss University, Italy. His scholarly interests range from comparative political philosophy to liberation theology and applied critical theory.
Silika Mohapatra is Research Scholar in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Delhi, India. Her research interests include classical metaphysics, phenomenology, semiotics and the ethics of self and society.© 2007 Routledge, member of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa Business


Sunday, December 27, 2009

Label of tradition is an illusion of control


How to read holy books Posted on February 15, 2009 by Sandeep

An essay by Sri Krishna Prem (Ronald Nixon): When a man says he believes in something or other (I do not mean rational belief based on consideration of evidence) itwould be more correct to say that he hopes that it may be true and, action and reaction being equal and opposite, he at the same time fears that it is not. Every belief then has its corresponding doubt lurking some where in the shadow. It is for this reason that men of strong religious beliefs become SO fanatical. Silently gnawing at their hearts, insi diously whispering in their ears, is an army of doubts, shadowy beings inhabiting a twilight world but corresponding exactly with the beliefs which, like so many children’s kites, go soaring up into the bright sunshine. It is to silence those whispers, to lay those ghosts in the basement, that the believer strives with all his might to convert others to his creed. Criticism he cannot stand because of the echoes that it raises down below where all should be silence; and so, just in proportion as he increases the force of his own beliefs, he magnifies the tension within and, filled with an inner hatred of himself, he vents his explosive anger upon others. Thus from a mere fanatic he becomes a persecutor.
What, then, should be our attitude towards the ancient scriptures, or, indeed, towards books in general? Books may be divided into two classes: those that are based upon inner experience and those that are mere words strung together with more or less skill. The latter class may be ignored altogether. It may be asked: how, if we are ourselves ignorant, we may know that a book is based upon genuine experience? The answer is that the Truth exists already in our hearts, however ignorant our outer personalities may be; it is a sheer fact that words that spring from deep realization raise echoes within us if we listen to them with free minds. The words, as we say, mean something to us. Perhaps there may be other books, equally the fruit of some one’s experience, which raise no echoes within. In that case it is some lack of sympathy or of experience, some knot of prejudice in our minds, that prevents our hearts from acting as resonators, and so we pnt the book aside. When that happens it is doubtless a pity bnt it cannot be helped; we are not ready for that particular message and its study can do us no good.
If, however, a book does ‘mean something to us’, if we have reason, inner reason, to think that it is a record of actual experience, wc should set aside all questions of its date and authorship, its orthodoxy or heterodoxy, its agreement or disagreement with other books. Instead, we should give our hearts to its study, trying to penetrate behind the words to the thoughts and realization for the expression of which those words were selected. [Excerpted from the book Initiation into Yoga by Sri Krishna Prem, ISBN 0091256313]


Can Carnatic music do with a little more sax? from churumuri by churumuri 

An evergreen debate on tradition versus modernity in Carnatic classical music has been revived with the music season on in full swing in Madras.
Last Sunday, T.M. Krishna, while arguing for preserving the integrity of the Carnatic tradition, wrote in The Hinduthat instruments like the saxophone and keyboard were just not cut out for the south Indian classical form.
This has drawn a response from the pianist Anil Srinivasan in the Sunday magazine of The Hindu:
“Tradition has become indelibly linked with the past. This is where the problems begin. We get autoregressive when discussing the preservation or conservation of a tradition. Trapping it in a time capsule and not allowing it to breathe or acquire newer characteristics is antithetical to the very notion of an intergenerational transfer….
“Historically, traditions were largely oral and were passed on from one generation to another….
“Music cannot be classified. To the human mind, the illusion of control or self perception leads it towards instant and automatic categorisation. We want to label everything we encounter because it makes us feel at least temporarily in control of the environment. And hence terming Carnatic music a tradition becomes a hook on which we hang our approximations of what we think South Indian classical music ought to be.”
In the same issue of The Hindu, Aruna Sairam tells Dr Srinivasan:
“Tradition exists to show you who you are. Innovation should be encouraged to show you who you could be…. Innovation is an approach to an existing body of work that has not been thought of before. In that respect, each of us is innovating constantly…. Only two things matter: be true to who you are, and be sincere in what you want to articulate. If this happens, the music will transcend categorisation and analysis.”

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Poetic theory & dramatic art of Sri Aurobindo

Young Aurobindo's Vision: The Viziers of Bassora — Dr Manoj Kumar Mishra
A Commentary on Sri Aurobindo's Poem Ilion — V. Murugesu
Sri Aurobindo's Yogic Consciousness & Poetry — Dr Nikhil Kumar
Sri Aurobindo and World Literature — Goutam Ghosal
Rainbow Bridge: A Comparative Study of Tagore and Sri Aurobindo

Sri Aurobindo's prose style (with a foreword by V.K. Gokak)


The Renaissance on Sri Aurobindo's Criticism — Goutam Ghosal
The Birth of Savitr — R. Y. Deshpande
Towards New Age — R. Y. Deshpande
Indian renaissance and future of the world - R.Y. Deshpande

Amal-Kiran: Poet and Critic

Sri Aurobindo and Greece — Amal Kiran (K. D. Sethna)
Talks on Poetry — Amal Kiran (K. D. Sethna)
Sri Aurobindo on Shakespeare — K. D. Sethna
Sri Aurobindo's Poetry and Sanskrit Rhetoric — Jugal Kishore Mukherjee
The Wonder That is K.D. Sethna Alias Amal Kiran — Jugal Kishore Mukherjee
The ascent of sight in Sri Aurobindo's Savitri — Jugal Kishore Mukherjee
Sri Aurobindo and Sanskrit — Dr Sampadananda Mishra
Sri Aurobindo's Plays: A Thematic Study — Sheo Shankar Jaiswal
The Plays of Sri Aurobindo: A Study — S. S. Kulkarni
Sri Aurobindo and the Poets of the Dawn — D. Venkateswara Rao
Sri Aurobindo: The Critic of English Poetry - D. Venkateswara Rao 
Sri Aurobindo: His Poetry and Poetic Theory — Prem Tyagi
Image, Symbol and Myth in Sri Aurobindo's Poetry — G. S. Pakle
Sri Aurobindo: His Mind and Art — Dr Kalaamani
Sri Aurobindo: Critical Considerations — O. P. Mathur
Dante and Sri Aurobindo: A Comparative Study of the Divine Comedy and Savitri Prema Nandakumar 
Sri Aurobindo: The Poet of Nature & Other Writings on Savitri — Asoka K. Ganguli
Sri Aurobindo's Savitri — Asoka K. Ganguli
Savitri, The Mother — Prof. M. V. Seetaraman
STUDIES IN SRI AUROBINDO'S DRAMATIC POEMS — Prof. M. V. Seetaraman
The dramatic art of Sri Aurobindo Avanindra Kumar Sinha 
Perspectives of Savitri: Volume 1 — Essays and articles by various authors

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The language has remained as aloof as ever

The Telegraph Front Page > Opinion Tuesday, December 15, 2009 OPED
Letter, spirit and persons
One’s thoughts must necessarily have a language that is tangible, organic and perhaps a combination of the languages of the thinker. Since the act of thinking precedes express... Read..

If Gujarati, my mother tongue, is a language of my primal emotions — there are terms such as those for items of food, parts of the body, to urinate, to go to bed, house… that I think of primarily in Gujarati — Arabic could very well be a language of my fears. While walking down a deserted road or while feeling there is a ghost in my bathroom, I find myself chanting snatches from the several passages I know in Arabic. I don’t know what they mean, but in moments of extreme anxiety, I am assured they are protecting me from evil.
Hindi, my second language in school, is one that keeps reminding me of Bollywood, and of the mindless filmy and melodramatic sessions — khush to bohot hoge tum aj, says a friend tilting slightly to one side like Amitabh Bachchan, to which one is expected to come up with an appropriate retort, Shashi Kapoor style.
INSIYA POONAWALA

By the throat
Languages are persons. Or at least, they have personalities, even characters, that may be pleasing, rough, transparent, tricky, furtive, sunny, bleak, manipulative, pliant... Read..

Devanagari holds no terrors for me. But except for hai and, perhaps, a few words like ladka or ladki, the language is an insoluble mystery to me. They tell me that watching Hindi films is a great way to pick up the language, everyone knows Hindi because of Bollywood. I have done so, faithfully, and the language has remained as aloof as ever. Hindi songs I love have not helped. I have learnt up the meanings of words, I have tried to read paragraphs of stories — and have ended up by being put in my place, puny and powerless. [...]

Official callers on the phone often insist on talking in Hindi, making my shamefaced English seem disgracefully out of tune with a resurgent India, and giving me no chance to display the frantic goodwill and desperate apology on my face. Worse, I don’t get it. I don’t follow a word once the conversation crosses the mark of three words. Hindi trounces me every time, apart from the fact that there is a deafening buzz in my ears when I find myself trapped in it. If a language refuses you, there is nothing you can do about it.
Pity I’ll never know who I would have been in Hindi.
BHASWATI CHAKRAVORTY

Tongues in the dark
Is bilingualism a kind of bisexuality as well? Are our English-speaking erotic personalities different from our vernacular ones? To what extent are sexual identities linguisti... Read..

As I was carefully translating into Bengali words and phrases that I would automatically use in English, the very nature of these things, their ‘feel’, started changing for me. I found myself becoming a different kind of speaking personality — a voice whose sexuality felt discomfitingly alien, and over which I seemed to have less and less control. Paradoxically, what this extended mother-tongue made me feel was not a greater facility of communication, but its opposite — a peculiarly tongue-tied distance from other human beings that was at once social and more intrinsic than social. [...]

In a society riven with inequalities, sexuality has a conflicted relationship with both language and silence. Most forms of repression and oppression feed on silence. The breaking of these silences often involves importing words and concepts into the vernaculars from another linguistic register or language (usually English). Such ‘consciousness-raising’ then becomes informed with the awkward gradients that separate the worlds of these languages or registers.
Sexuality’s necessary darkness needs to be protected as much from the divisive and clarifying glare of language as from the ills of benightedness.
AVEEK SEN

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Edmund Wilson in Banaras; Pericles and Plato in Hampi

Peter Watts alert from The Pinocchio Theory by Steven Shaviro
Peter Watts is a brilliant science fiction writer — I have written about all four of his novels on this blog (Starfish, Maelstrom, Behemoth, and (at greatest length) Blindsight).

A note on Orientalism from The Joyful Knowing by Mike Johnduff
So, I divorced literary theory from critical theory a bit last time. But I did so not to knock at the latter so much as show how literary theory is really doing something else, something less critical in the sense that people have been lately been referring to it--that is, negatively, and with its Kantian overtone. This isn't to say that ideology critique isn't also what we do in literary studies

Dec 11, 2009 another great Gibbon half-sentence from Object-Oriented Philosophy by doctorzamalek
He’s always able to say a lot very elegantly before he hits his first semicolon:
“The arts of negotiation, unknown to the simple greatness of the senate and the Caesars, were assiduously cultivated by the Byzantine princes…”
But the theater of action under discussion here is Persia, and Gibbon just can’t ever quite make Persia as interesting a theme as it really is.

Mirror of Tomorrow Re: Social Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo and the New Age by Kishor Gandhi—an Appraisal by RY Deshpande
by
paulette on Sat 12 Dec 2009 Permanent Link We should also take into account that the Greek civilization, like all others at that time, was based on slavery; the preceptors and law-codifiers were slaves; women were not part of the political system, but beautiful subjugated foreign ladies were brilliant, cultivated entertainers of the wealthy; homosexuality and even pederasty were current, and so was sexuality under whatever form. [...] Regarding historicism, here is another example, rescuing me from the shock of reading, regarding the dharma-fulfillers emperors of Hampi -- one thousand years after Pericles and Plato!:

“Beautiful maidens seem always to have been present, and concubines frequently accompanied the king. The literary sources portray the Vijayanagara ruler surrounded by women who adore him and spoil him, and with whom he cannot resist flirting; in this respect, he is considered as an irresistible erotic figure. Even when he leaves the palace, the king is rarely without the company of his favourites. The foreigners comment appreciatively on the dress, ornaments and varied accomplishments of these ladies, confirming that some were educated and talented courtesans. [the equivalent of the Greek hetaeras, high class cultivated courtesans?] However, the women who were seen with the king on these more public occasions are to be distinguished from the royal queens and family members who were confined to segregated and strictly guarded zones within the palace.” [From “Hampi”, John M Fritz & George Michell, pp.35-6.]

Dec 11, 2009 The Selfishness of the Selfless from One Cosmos by Gagdad Bob
One important area in which Christianity and non-dualism radically diverge is over the question of hope. In the former, not only is hope permitted, but it is one of the theological virtues. In contrast, in non-dualism there is nothing to hope for and no one to hope for it, for neither sappy hope nor the dopey hoper are within the scope of the Real.

A couple of days ago, some astute commenter -- Warren, it was -- mentioned that one of the benefits of non-dualism is that it authorizes one to indulge one's impulses without having to feel guilt or shame before the transcendent Other. Non-dualists may dispute this characterization, but they really don't have an ontological leg to stand on, for just who is doing the disputing? And just what are they pulling if we have no legs? (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

Is it any wonder that the list of self-styled non-dualists and "independent gurus" who have set up shop in the West -- e.g., Da Free John, Chogyam Trungpa, Deepak Chopra, Krishnamurti, Rajneesh, and all the rest -- reveals a litany of duplicitous sexual, financial, and spiritual abuse? They are always -- either conveniently or inconveniently -- blindsided by the very desires they deny and claim to have transcended.

Coming up: The Middle Stage's Books of the Year from The Middle Stage by Chandrahas
Coming up over the next fortnight on The Middle Stage: as in 2008, two long essays on the best fiction and the best non-fiction that's come my way this year. On Written For Ever: The Best of Civil Lines
It is immediately clear from Advani’s anthology that the magazine published some outstanding non-fiction in its heyday (the late eighties, when three issues came out in quick succession). Dilip Simeon’s “O.K. TATA: Mobiloil Change and World Revolution”, an essay about a truck driver who discovers that his khalasi, or helper, is a Naxalite, evokes life on the road in the most sumptuous detail, while Ramachandra Guha’s “An Anthropologist Among The Marxists” describes with a giddy devotion the author’s first-hand knowledge of the various Calcutta factions of Marxism gleaned as a doctoral student in Calcutta. Alongside Pankaj Mishra’s “Edmund Wilson in Banaras” (published elsewhere), these essays must rank as two of the greatest in modern Indian prose. Indeed, Simeon’s piece deserves further praise for the acuity with which it transforms the substantially non-English world of truckers into an English that never seems incongruous.

Meeting Prithwindra Mukherjee, Article and interview by Sunayana Panda '79, The Golden Chain, August 2009: There are many in the world who can speak several languages and quite a few who read more than one language, but rare are those who can express their abstract thoughts in more than one language in writing. Even in India, where there are so many official languages, urban Indians have great difficulty in writing even in one Indian language correctly.

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Marshall McLuhan reminds us that technology extends the human body into inanimate form

Thoughts on the Fluid Piano from The Daily Goose by Matthew

I’m talking on the internal front, now. I’m talking improved musicianship. Here I connect this instrument with the kind of singing/listening exercises found in the first 150 or so pages of W.A. Mathieu’s monumental book Harmonic Experience. Mathieu (my teacher and friend) details singing exercises you will find, by my lights, no where else in contemporary Western musical literature. These exercises (informed by his own study of classical North Indian singing for over 30 years, as well as his training in European music and American jazz) provide the student with a felt-experience and internalized wisdom about harmony, about the way music works on levels very deep.

These kind of exercises (which in my online writing I have referred to as “Tone Yoga“) provide a number of benefits. But specific to this discussion, they allow one to develop an internal tonal compass, or pitch recognizer, whereby one can sense far more palpably and perfectly subtleties of pitch one didn’t really notice before. [...]

Marshall McLuhan reminds us that technology extends the human body into inanimate form. The wheel extends our feet. The plow extends our hands. Electricity our nervous system. The phone our voice. A house our skin. Thus Mr Smith’s piano, too, extends something of us. In part, the Fluid Piano becomes more of an extension of the human singing voice than the current piano; the voice can (and very often does) capture tones a piano can’t. But the extensions go further: a conventional piano, and thus the Fluid Piano to an even greater extent, extends a music order of polyphony, or many-voices at once. But no in an even more precise, attuned manner. It is up to musicians to make these possibilities musically appealing to the average listener.

The Fluid Piano doesn’t create anything “new” that we didn’t have before, but rather allows us to realize something in a more unnatural, artificial, externalized and examined way (like all technology). Which means Mr Smith’s piano, while seeming exotic, can in fact help us realize and express something we already have. Certainly the piano means a new playing field with a set of rules that include old rules as well as those new. And one of those is a profound challenge to the musician to know more about tones. Call it the a tool for “pitch etymology”.

As a musician, to know tones deeply in the body is, I think, a kind of responsibility, that of intimacy with the raw materials of music that hold a power and magic so crucial to human life. To be a musician means, at the end, that one must by spurts and fits deepen a relationship with nothing less than the enduring human heart. Itself an extension of . . . well, I’ll stop right here.

Monday, December 07, 2009

Bouquet of 24 sweet real life tales

Judge Saheb O Maharanir One-Third Dozen er Kahini: A Review

By Anurag Banerjee

Sri Aurobindo had once remarked that humour was the salt of existence and in a letter to Dilip Kumar Roy, he had written: ‘There is laughter in the Kingdom of Heaven though there may be no marriage there.’ And Yogi Krishnaprem too had remarked in one of his books: ‘Laughter was given by the Gods to man and it was one of their choicest gifts.’

Krishna Chakravarti’s latest book in Bengali, Judge Saheb O Maharanir One-Third Dozen er Kahini, echo the very words of Sri Aurobindo and Krishnaprem. In an age where we have forgotten to laugh aloud or whole-heartedly due to sundry reasons this book, which is a collection of twenty-four real life incidents, gifts us some very precious moments of genuine laughter and therefore it is instrumental in bringing the lost asset of laughter back to our lives.

The stories revolve around six characters— ‘Judge Saheb’ (Sanotsh Chakravarti, the late Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court), his wife whom he lovingly addressed as ‘Maharani’ (Queen) and their ‘one-third dozen’, that is, four children. On reading the stories, the reader is bound to feel: ‘I wish I had been a part of this one-third dozen.’ Such regret is justified because seldom in life do we have such experiences that remain as fresh as ever even after the lapse of several decades. Special thanks must be given to Krishna Charavarti not only for preserving these tales but also for sharing these anecdotes with us and giving us and posterity a reason to smile.

What is noteworthy about the author’s style of writing is that she does not merely write her words, she illustrates them. And as a result we could have a glimpse of the characters of the stories even with our eyes closed. Since the book is written in Bengali, only those who are Bengalis (by birth and choice) and who know the language would be able to relish this bouquet of sweet tales offered by the author. If only had this book been written in English it would have made a wider range of readers smile. Such tales are not meant for a particular period or age-group, these are tales of all times and for all ages. [Krishna Chakravarti « The Mother's Lasso]

Sunday, December 06, 2009

Perfect blending of moral and spiritual aspiration with the fury, tumult and pulse of human life

The Great Indian Novel; In our previous article we discussed the ideal or dharma of a novel and mentioned the possibility of considering Mahabharata as the great Indian novel. This mighty epic of Vyasa is a vast, oceanic creation, which cannot be confined within any narrow literary framework. Mahabharata is at once poetry and myth, history and philosophy, epic and drama, religious classic and spiritual hymn, political and social literature and an esoteric novel. This article examines Mahabharata in the limited perspective of the ideal of a novel.

The Epical Novel
M.S. Srinivasan

Some of the traditional and orthodox purists in India may object vehemently to this perspective and say Mahabharata is something too sacred to view as a novel. But the epic of Vyasa is not purely a sacred literature discoursing on gods, saints and sages. It is an epic and drama of human life in which human nature and life is depicted in all its colours and shades, weakness and virtues, nobility and depravity, divinity and beasthood.

In an esoteric perspective, the main characters of the epic are representatives of the three layers or dimensions of the human consciousness or self. First, is the higher self, which is open and receptive to the higher values and aims of life like truth, beauty, goodness, harmony and the Divine. In the Indian tradition all these higher values and ideals which lead to the mental, moral, aesthetic and spiritual progress of humanity are called as Dharma. The lower self is that part of human nature which is closed to these higher values of Dharma and the Divine and therefore tends towards the undivine or antidivine or adharma. The third is the divine Self, which is beyond the lower and higher self and governs the evolution of the human being mostly from behind the veil. However, when we are able to live in our higher self and open our consciousness to the divinity within us, then, we become more and more conscious of the direct guidance of the divine self.

In Mahabharata, Sri Krishna represents the divine Self. The human characters represent the higher and lower self in man. The five Pandava heroes and the heroine represent the higher self, which is open to the divine Self. The Kaurava prince Duryodhana and his cohorts represent the lower self. But in our human consciousness the higher and lower self is mixed together, though in an individual any can dominate his life. But there are also complex intermediate states between the lower and the higher and also the higher and the divine self with mixed loyalties! Characters of Mahabharata reflect this complexity of human nature.

So in Mahabharata heroes and villains are not presented as unmixed good and evil. The Pandava heroes follow the values of their higher self and they are open to the divine guidance of Sri Krishna. But they are not without their weaknesses. Even the most righteous, noble and holy Yudhistra is not able to resist gambling. The most heroic Arjuna seems to have a weakness for women and sometimes tends to be a little vain and proud of his prowess. The strong and powerful Bheema is prone to violence. Draupadi, the heroine is wise and compassionate but also fiery, volatile and vengeful. Similarly, the villain, the Kaurava king Duryodhana suffers from an incurable jealousy and hatred towards the Pandava heroes who are his cousins. But he is also frank, brave, and magnanimous towards his friends and an able ruler.

There are characters like Dhritharashtra, the blind father of Duryodhana who represents the half-sincere and half-hypocritic philistine within us hovering inbetween the lower and higher self. He has an attraction or affinity to his higher self not perhaps inborn, but induced by the cultural influences of his age or the society. But he doesn’t have the strength to overcome his attachment to his lower self and its desires. His goodness is a little dubious because most often it is actuated by subconscious, selfish motives of his lower self. But he justifies whatever he does with lofty and noble justifications. He can hide his questionable motives and his negative feelings, even fierce hatred, behind gentle and sweet words and behaviour. For example, after the Kurukshetra war, when the victorious Pandava heroes come to meet Dritharashtra, he welcomes them with pleasant and affectionate words and embraces them, inwardly burning with anger against them, especially against Bheema who has killed his dear son Duryodhana. So when he embraces Bheema he tries to crush him to death in his arms. But Krishna, knowing the inner condition of Dritharashtra, saves Bhima by putting an iron image of Bheema into his arms, which gets crushed to pieces!

But Dritharashtra is not an average philistine who is comfortably in his half-conscious hypocrisy. Somewhere in a little corner of his being or in the depth of his heart he is open to his higher and the divine self. This point of conscience will not allow him to reconcile entirely with the attachment and insincerities of his lower self. So he is a tormented character in the epic with constant lamentations and self-reproach expressed in pious and gentle words, but his frank and discerning charioteer Sanjaya, unmasking the deceptions of his royal master; says: “O, king your lamentations are like honey hiding poison.”

There are other characters in the epic like Bhishma, Drona and Karna who represent parts of the higher self either not open to the progressive march of the Divine or not able to surrender entirely to the Divine due to some attachment to old, traditional or established values and ideals which are no longer valid or relevant to the future evolution of the individual or the world. So we find them fighting against the Pandava heroes and their divine charioteer. Beyond this psychological symbolism, the characters and events of Mahabharata may have a still deeper spiritual significance, indicating or representing the working out of the Divine Will in the life of man and the world. In this higher spiritual perspective even the defects of the main characters, who are missioned instruments of the Divine, serve a divine purpose.

But the greatness of Mahabharata lies in the perfect blending of the higher moral and spiritual aspiration, which runs throughout the epic, with the fury, tumult and pulse of human life. The dominant note of this higher aspiration in this Indian epic is Courage and Strength of Character, which communicates itself to the reader with an intense sincerity.

The heroes of Mahabharata pass through many vicissitudes of life and many sufferings, tribulations and humiliations inflicted on them by Duryodhana and his vicious assistants and advisers. But they cling steadfastly to the higher ideal and aspirations of Dharma and their faith in divine guidance of Sri Krishna. And after a Great War at Kurukshethra, which leads to much destruction and slaughter, the heroes of the epic come out victorious with the divine help of Krishna. The significance of the story to the inner life of a seeker is unmistakable.

Life in Mahabharata
An ideal novel should not only mirror human nature but also the life around. The historic life that is mirrored in Mahabharata is the life of ancient India especially that of the ruling and warrior class, the Kshatrias. This ruling class in ancient India is in general educated, learned, cultured, trained in the Indian Kshatria traditions of courage, heroism, chivalry, honour. But sometimes it is also rude, arrogant, lusty, violent and impulsive. Mahabharata brings out both the strength and weakness of this Kshatria class. But the extent of life that is mirrored in Mahabharata is much vaster than this thin strip of history. For Mahabharata is not merely a novel but an epic created by a great sage, Vyasa, who is one of the greatest spiritual figures of ancient India. And a spiritual man like Vysya can see what an ordinary novelist cannot see. He can see and feel not only the outer visible facts and phenomenon of life but also the invisible supraphysical, occult, cosmic and divine forces which act through and behind the outer life. He has also an intuitive and experiential understanding of the deeper and higher truths and laws which govern the life of man and the world or in other words intricacies of Fate and Karma, ways of the gods and the titans and the mysteries of the workings of the Divine in man which sometimes are baffling to our human moral nations.

The great Rishi Vyasa brings all this higher spiritual knowledge and vision of a sage into his epic, expressing it either openly in dialogue and story or symbolically through characters and events. For someone who is inwardly advanced and has a spiritual insight Mahabharata may reveal many deep layers of inner meaning―psychological, occult and spiritual.

But even in the historical life that is portrayed in Mahabharata, it embraces almost every aspect of human life―religious, political, social, cultural, mental, moral and spiritual. We have said that an ideal novel must be able to communicate a higher aspiration to the reader and to do this it must be a creative expression of the personal experiences of the author. But is it possible for a single person to have such a vast and varied experience of life from the lowest mundane to the highest spiritual? To answer this question we must have some understanding of the nature of spiritual knowledge of a sage.

According to Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, experiences of a spiritual man are not narrowly personal. He can in his universal consciousness, identify with the experiences of others and know it and feel it as his own, but without getting involved in it or overwhelmed by it. He can also identify in a similar way with the universal life and the universal forces of life. For example a spiritual man may not have any personal experience of sex but he can identify with the sexual experiences of others or with the universal vital force behind sex. The Mother narrates an interesting incident. When she was sitting in a park in France, there was a couple nearby who were kissing passionately. When Mother looked at them, suddenly the joy they were feeling entered into her and she was able to feel it within her!1 And Sri Aurobindo writes in one of his sonnets “The worlds’s joy thrilling runs through me, I bear the sorrow of millions in my lonely breast.” 2 But since the spiritual man has a deeper consciousness than the ordinary man he can feel and know the deeper truth of an experience, which the ordinary man cannot feel. So a spiritual man who has no personal experience of sex may sometimes have a better knowledge of sex than the worldly libertine who wallows in it! This applies to all worldly experience and knowledge. A spiritual man, because of his deeper and universal consciousness and his capacity for knowledge by identity can have a deeper and better knowledge of the world than the worldly man. This is perhaps the reason why in ancient India, the Rishi was considered as the best guide of not only the religious and spiritual life but also the secular life and someone who has written Kamasutra is considered as a sage!

Song of Ideal Humanity
One of the “secular” objections, which may be raised against calling Mahabharata as a novel, is the superhuman element in the main characters and heroes of the epic. But this is because the heroes of the epic do not belong to ordinary humanity but to the archetypal humanity. They are universal archetypes of human character, temperament and quality. For in Indian thought, human soul and nature are limited expressions of the transcendent and universal Divine. In our deepest spiritual self or soul we are with an eternal spark of the transcendent Divine and when it comes to our body, life and mind we are flowers of Cosmic Nature. So whatever fundamental types, temperament, character or qualities we find in humanity, they have their ideal and universal archetypes in the cosmic or divine consciousness of the Spirit or Nature. The archetypes represent the ideal, universal, impersonal and higher potentialities of human types. In a religious or theistic language archetypes are the gods.

The main characters of Mahabharata, especially its heroes are creative representation of universal archetypes. The great heroes of the epic are depicted as sons of gods who successively unite with a human mother to give birth to the six heroes. So the heroes of Mahabharata tend towards the ideal and the superhuman, representing the higher potentialities of humanity. For Mahabharata does not approve or glorify the cult of the average man. Its aim is to inspire the masses with the vision and values of an ideal humanity raised to its highest potential. It accepts the legitimate needs, interests and desires of the average man but at the same it also tells him “Don’t remain content there.They are not your highest potential or aim. Once the natural cravings of your body and life are reasonably fulfilled, move forward to realize your higher mental, moral, aesthetic and spiritual potentialities and the highest spiritual aim of life.”

The Language and Style
But higher aspiration, idealism and vision are not enough to make a literary composition into an ideal novel. If the story and the narrative do not catch the sustained interest and attention of the emotional and vital being of the masses it fails as a novel, whatever may be its other literary merits.

The style of Mahabharata is poetic and based on the canons of Sanskrit poetry of ancient India, which may not be appealing to a modern reader. Those who are not open to Indian poetic sensibilities may find the long-winding dialogues, amusing similes like “O, woman who has the gait of an elephant” and the labyrinthine maze of stories within stories, boring, heavy and dragging. However, the central story is still absorbing, at least to the Indian audience, though it may not match the taut and gripping pace of a Robert Ludlum or Fredrick Forsyth. The mass-appeal of Mahabharata for the Indian audience is amply demonstrated when it was serialized for television. When this extremely popular serial was telecast in the morning hours of Sundays, most of urban life in India came to a standstill, people were glued to the television, shops were closed and streets were empty. Share this Print this Write to us (M.S. Srinivasan is a research associate in Sri Aurobindo Society.) References: Champaklal, Champaklal Speaks, (1976), p.132. Sri Aurobindo, SABCL, vol.5, pp.136

Gurcharan Das: On the difficulty of being good
25 Jan 2009 ... This is the official blog site of Gurcharan Das. ... It might have been hubris, like Duryodhana's in the Mahabharata, who thought he was ... Mahabharata for modern times at Asian Window
12 Sep 2009 ... Gurcharan Das is a multi-talented man. ... has taken on the difficult task of reading the Mahabharata and interpreting its many messages in ... Good vs Bad in Gurcharan Das book
18 Sep 2009 ... NEW DELHI: Columnist and writer Gurcharan Das, author of best-selling "India Unbound", has turned to the epic Mahabharata in his new book, ...